Our gallant Nigerian military that has been fighting Boko Haram to
finish has declared a journalist, Ahmed Sakida, wanted just hours after
he realeased the latest Boko Haram video on his Twitter page. The tone
in which the military claimed that Salkida and two others have
questionable links with the terrorist group clearly suggests that the
military is hunting for him, not "inviting" him for a discussion.
Even though we know that the military is not the EFCC, a civilian
organ of the government, we expect that it will be more civil than this
in looking for the journalist. Jumping to a declaration at the sight of a
video on a Twitter page of a journalist whose address is publicly known
clearly shows that the War College lessons did not sink deeply in the
minds of our generals and their spokespersons.
Otherwise, they would have easily recalled a similar blunder made by
the American government when Al-Jazeerah started airing Bin Laden
videos. The same knee-jerk reaction: Al-Jazeerah must explain its links
with Al-Qaeda. One of Al-Jazeerah's photographers was arrested and sent
to Guantanamo. Its Baghdad office was targeted by American bombs. In the
end, it just became known that the world will get used to listening to
insurgents firsthand through channels that the insurgents consider
reliable to them.
Trust
And do we fault Al-Qaeda or Boko Haram in this? Absolutely not. Why
do we think that such groups would be foolish enough to entrust VOA or
NTA with their messages? It is the issue of trust. And the journalist is
so unlucky that his calling obliges him to be even handed with
information, conveying it to the public with the highest possible
efficacy. Salkida just did that, by Twitter.
Any true journalist carries this burden wherever he goes, whatever
information he handles and from whoever it may be, be it from the bad
guys or from the good ones - if the good ones at all exist. He is not an
agent of any government or its military, but that of the people for
whom he risks his life to source for the news and to whom he delivers
it, intact, whether good or sad. He belongs to everybody.
The Law
Knowing that his practice could be at great variance with the
interest of governments at moments like this, the law - both
international and local - protected the journalist by giving him the
right to decline revealing his source of information, whatever type it
is, once he is convinced of its authenticity. And he must not be
attacked in any conflict while he carries on his duty. Soja, kun ji ko?
The Nigerian military also teaches these basics of constitutional law
in its War College and staff schools. Yet, as usual, it always likes to
bully innocent citizens by behaving as if it is not a subject of the
law.
On this I am not on the same page with the Nigerian military and, as a
student of law, I should be the last to do this. Neither should any
democrat or constituted authority - including the Dubai government -
support this. I am pleading with the military to reconsider its stand
and approach on the matter.
The address of Salkida is known to the Nigerian government. He has
been interacting with it - from a distance though - on matters regarding
Boko Haram. Salkida is not hiding. He is just on self-exile for his
safety after an excruciating experience that is about to repeat itself.
If I were the COAS, intimidation would never be a tool I will deploy
against any journalist. I would prefer to use him to my end.
I knew it will come to this since when the COAS said that Boko Haram
was behind the revelations on his Dubai property. Immediately I heard
that I said, "Shi ke nan. Kashin Salkida ya bushe." (Salkida is in
trouble.) Burutai would most likely think that nobody else could do it
other than the Dubai-based journalist that has links with Boko Haram?
And with the latest video published on his Twitter page, the Nigerian
military may be saying, "Behold, here comes the chance."
So let our gallant soldiers continue to fight Boko Haram and let Boko
Haram continue to send its videos to different channels. Let those
channels convey them to the public once they are convinced that the
message is worthy of our attention without being restrained by anyone.
On this, I am on the same page with Salkida.
The military should be careful in how it treats Salkida. Any harm
against him may backfire on our girls. Those BH guys believe in "an eye
for an eye" to the letter; many times they will pluck many eyes for just
one. Unless the military wants to be reckless with the lives of the
remaining girls, it must not choose to send even a fly against the
journalist.
The President
I would like the President to wade into the matter urgently. He was
once praying for the whereabouts of the girls to be revealed. Yesterday,
the revelation came to him through Twitter. He must use it, now.
As a general, he should know his onions very well: victory in the
end. But as a President and a father, that victory must come without
necessarily shedding the blood of our daughters. As he promised us -
their parents - he should seize this opportunity to negotiate their
release immediately.
While there could be only a military solution to end the BH war,
there must not be only a military solution to rescue our girls. To date,
not a single girl was rescued by the military. So that solution is
proven ineffective. A different path must be followed.
The path to rescuing our girls is now known: it is through
negotiations that will end not in the establishment of a BH caliphate in
Nigeria as the insurgents were previously demanding, but in just the
release of some BH members from our prisons. Here, the BH spokesman on
the latest video was clear in alluding that the only guide they approve
of on that path is one person: the journalist whom they trust and relate
with. Call him Ahmed Salkida, if you like. Any other person, they said
is fake.
This guide therefore deserves our protection, not incarceration. Let
the President use him to lead the path to the release of our girls. The
military should remain in their domain of fighting the insurgency to
finish. Otherwise, if given the freehand as in Zaria 2015, our girls may
not return at all.
Choice
In conclusion, we are faced with two scenarios. One is to save the
girls and win the war by negotiating for the release of the girls now
and continuing to fight the war to victory. The other, a less prudent
and a very foolish one indeed, is to lose the girls and win the war by
fighting only and refusing to negotiate for the release of the girls or
by doing anything that may imperil their lives.
The girls, their parents and any "bloody civilian" like me will
prefer the first. Those interested in exercising their might or settling
some scores may choose the second. That is why they are looking for
Salkida to show them where the girls are, thinking that he knows. And
you know what will happen: Zaria. But the choice is neither theirs nor
ours.
It is the President's. In making up his mind, I pray that the
President will forget, even for just the moment, that he is a general,
but a father of our beautiful Zahra and the husband of my elegant
sister, Aisha.
No comments:
Post a Comment